How to prepare your company and data for an AI agent: 6 steps
Six steps a company with 20–150 employees can take to get its process, data, access rights, approvals, people and metrics ready before an AI agent pilot.
You have decided to trial an AI agent and are looking for a supplier. Yet the work that matters most for the pilot is yours, not the supplier’s – and most of it takes two to three weeks and little money. This guide shows what to prepare and what to keep in your own hands.
Why pilots fail because of the company, not the AI
In June 2025, Gartner predicted that more than 40% of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by the end of 2027. It named three reasons: escalating costs, unclear business value and inadequate risk controls. None of them concerns the quality of the model.
MIT NANDA’s July 2025 report “The GenAI Divide” paints a similar picture: 95% of organisations see no measurable return on their investment in generative AI. The findings are preliminary and the methodology modest (interviews in 52 organisations, 153 survey responses and a review of more than 300 public projects), so treat the figure as a signal rather than a precise statistic. More important is why the authors say pilots stall: brittle workflows, no learning from the company’s own context, and a poor fit with day-to-day operations.
McKinsey’s survey “The state of AI in 2025” (November 2025) found that the companies gaining the most from AI (around 6% of respondents) were almost three times more likely than the rest to have fundamentally redesigned their workflows instead of layering AI onto an existing process.
The common denominator is company readiness – something you can build in advance, on your own and cheaply.
Step 1: Pick one process and describe it as it actually runs
Not as the internal policy describes it. Sit down with the people who do the work and note who, what, when, in which system, which exceptions occur and what happens when something is missing. One or two pages plus a list of exceptions is enough.
What makes a good pilot candidate:
- it repeats daily or weekly,
- it has enough volume (dozens of cases a week),
- it has a clear start and end,
- it has a measurable outcome,
- a mistake by the agent has minor consequences and can be corrected.
Take a company with 40 employees that receives enquiries via a web form and email. A sales rep reads them, re-types them into the CRM, assigns them to a colleague and replies. The process has clear boundaries and daily volume, and a mistake (a misfiled enquiry) can be put right. A description like this is the core of a free process audit.
A closing question: if the person who runs this process left for a month, could someone else take it over from your description?
Step 2: Get the data the agent will see in order
Where the data lives and what state it is in
List your sources: mailboxes, CRM, ERP, shared drives, Excel spreadsheets. For each, note the owner, the number of records and the known problems – duplicate customers, incomplete fields, a price list in three versions. An agent will not fix these errors; it will only make them faster.
What the agent needs and what it does not
Article 5(1)(c) of the GDPR requires personal data to be “adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary” for the purpose. For an agent this means a simple rule: it sees only what its task requires, not everything. Mark which fields contain personal data and which documents are sensitive (contracts, payroll, health data). Article 25 (data protection by design and by default) demands the same at the design stage. If you keep records of processing activities under Article 30, add a new line.
Knowledge base
If the agent is to answer from documents, prepare current versions only. Give every document an owner and a last-review date. Move old price lists and superseded terms and conditions to an archive the agent cannot reach.
Concrete step: one spreadsheet with the columns source, owner, contains personal data (yes/no), agent needs it (yes/no).
Step 3: Access and permissions – a dedicated account for the agent
The agent must not run under the managing director’s account or a shared team password. It needs its own service account with the fewest permissions it can work with. NIST defines this principle (least privilege) as an architecture in which each entity is granted the minimum system resources and authorisations it needs to perform its function. It applies to people and automated processes alike.
In practice this means:
- a service account for the agent in every system it uses (CRM, email, ERP),
- API keys with a limited scope (for instance read contacts only, no deletion),
- a separate test environment, or at least a test mailbox and a test list in the CRM,
- a log of every agent action, stored with you and not only with the supplier.
Questions for your IT administrator or external IT provider: Do our systems have an API, and who has the documentation? Who can create an account with restricted rights? Where will logs be stored, and for how long? Who will read them?
Step 4: Decide what the agent may do alone and what a human approves
This decision is yours, not the supplier’s. Sort actions by the consequences a mistake would have, and set who approves them and by when.
| Type of action | Who approves | How quickly |
|---|---|---|
| Reading data, sorting, summarising | Nobody – the agent acts alone | Continuously |
| Drafting a reply to a customer | The employee who sends the reply | Within one working day |
| Creating or changing a CRM record | Process owner, sample checks | Continuously, review once a week |
| Sending an email to a customer | Employee – human approval | Within four hours |
| Payment, price change, discount, contract | Managing director or department head – always | As needed, never automatically |
Rule for the pilot: start in “agent drafts, human sends” mode. Release low-consequence actions only once several weeks of logs show a low error rate. Never release payments and contracts.
Step 5: Prepare your people – who works with the agent and who owns it
The agent’s owner should be someone from operations who knows the process – not IT. IT provides the accounts and logs; the owner decides what the agent does and whether it does it well. Write one page on what changes in the team’s work (re-typing into the CRM disappears) and what stays (pricing decisions, customer contact).
Article 4 of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) – the duty to promote AI literacy – has applied since 2 February 2025. A company deploying an AI system must take measures to support the AI literacy of its staff and of others who work with the system on its behalf. The European Commission states that no certificate is required; an internal training record is enough. The 2026 amendment (the Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744) softened the wording of Article 4: the obligation remains, but the company need not guarantee a specific level of knowledge in any individual. National supervisory authorities will enforce the rules from 2 August 2026. For a small company this means a short session on what the agent does, where it makes mistakes and how to report them – plus a dated record with names.
Address the team’s concerns openly. People will ask whether they will lose their jobs and who answers for the agent’s mistakes. Give concrete answers before the pilot, not after.
Step 6: Measure the “before” so you know whether it paid off
Without “before” figures, the post-pilot debate will be about feelings. For two weeks before launch, measure:
- time per case (from the enquiry arriving to the reply),
- number of cases per week,
- share of errors or returned cases,
- response time to the customer,
- hours per month the team spends on the process.
A shared spreadsheet and some discipline are all it takes. Track the same metrics during the pilot (3–6 weeks) and compare. Add two questions for the team: what does the agent do well, and where did they have to correct it?
Checklist before your first meeting with a supplier
- One process described as it actually runs, exceptions included.
- Criteria confirmed: repetition, volume, clear boundaries, measurable outcome, minor consequences of a mistake.
- An inventory of data sources with owners and known problems.
- Personal data and sensitive documents marked; decided what the agent will not see.
- A knowledge base of current documents only, each with a review date.
- A service account for the agent with minimum rights and API keys with a limited scope.
- A test environment and a place to store the logs.
- A table of actions: what the agent may do alone, what a human approves and by when.
- A process owner from operations, not from IT.
- A short team training session and a record of it (Article 4 of the AI Act).
- Two weeks of measured “before” metrics.
- A decision on where the data is processed – in the EU, at the model provider or on your own infrastructure – and who approved it.
Key takeaway: AI agent pilots fail more often on an unprepared company than on the model. A process described as it really runs, a data inventory, a dedicated agent account with minimum rights, clear approval rules, an owner from operations and “before” metrics – you can do all of it yourselves in two to three weeks. You then hand the supplier a specific task, not chaos. The key decisions – access, data and what the agent may do – stay with you.
To go through these steps with the Easytrade team, which has already deployed agents into CRM and email workflows, book a free consultation – we will review your process together and decide whether a free process audit is the right first step.
Sources
- Gartner Predicts Over 40% of Agentic AI Projects Will Be Canceled by End of 2027 – https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-06-25-gartner-predicts-over-40-percent-of-agentic-ai-projects-will-be-canceled-by-end-of-2027
- MIT NANDA: The GenAI Divide – State of AI in Business 2025, July 2025 (PDF copy; MIT provides the original on request) – https://cloudelligent.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/v0.1_State_of_AI_in_Business_2025_Report.pdf
- McKinsey: The state of AI in 2025 – Agents, innovation, and transformation – https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), Articles 5, 25 and 30 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679
- European Commission: AI literacy – Questions & Answers (Article 4 of the AI Act) – https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/ai-literacy-questions-answers
- Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of 8 July 2026 (Digital Omnibus on AI), new wording of Article 4 of the AI Act – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32026R1744
- NIST CSRC Glossary: least privilege – https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/least_privilege